Wednesday, December 16, 2009

NZ's Best Captain

Hello and welcome back to my blog

Sky Television recently featured an episode of their series 'The Chosen Ones' featuring former New Zealand captain Stephen Fleming and watching the very in depth interview with Ian Smith convinced me to do a blog entry devoted to one of that country's best cricketers and least lorded.

Stephen Fleming debuted in Hamilton in March 1994 in a New Zealand side that was a shadow of the strong team of the 1980s. Hadlee, Cairns, Wright and Bracewell were gone and Martin Crowe was at the end of his career. The test in question against India and was drawn but not before the young debutant impressed with an elegant 92 (177) in the second innings.

Although not apparent to any at the time, this innings sums up the man's career:

  • Ability to bat for long periods
  • Excellence at driving and playing the pull/hook sho
  • Habit of getting out just short of a century



Fleming, like the team itself, struggled after this to get consistency and put results on the board. Nearly 3 years later he scored his maiden test century, 129 (254) against England in Auckland. That series was important for him for another reason, after the team was thrashed by an innings in the second test Fleming was chosen to be captain in the third. He was just 1 month short of his 24 birthday and the youngest New Zealand had ever appointed. By his own admission he wasn't ready but the did score 62 important runs and although the test was lost, the margin was by just 4 wickets

In November of that year he faced a tough lesson in captaincy as Mark Taylor's Australian team beat New Zealand comfortably and Fleming's own form was poor (3 ducks in the series). However he lifted his game during the ODIs that followed scoring match-winning hundreds in Melbourne (116*) and Napier (111*)

One skill set in cricket that he excelled at was batting in the sub-continent. Fleming proved this for the first time in May of 1998 with his highest score (to that point) of 174* (333) in Colombo. For the next 3 years his captaincy flourished and the core group of players in the team reached their prime - the likes of Chris Cairns, Nathan Astle, Dion Nash and Craig McMillan. His own form was patchy but his tactics and plans for every player in each series pushed New Zealand's results and the ranking. The highlight for him and most of the country was a surprise series win in England in 1999 (after a very good showing in the World Cup)


Although that series represented a personal challenge for a team from a former colony, the real test was to compete with Australia - now under Steve Waugh - the best team in the world. Beaten 3-0 at home, the expectation was not great for the 2001 series IN Australia. However Fleming out thought his rival and drew the series 0-0 (could have been a 2-0 victory if certain things had gone the Kiwis' way). For himself the hundred (105 off 222 balls) in Perth was a welcome return to form and his reputation as the best captain in the world was secured. He had taken an out-gunned team to the belly of the beast and survived

The fortunes of the team under Fleming continued to shine as 7 months later they won their first series in the West Indies in which he led from the front with 130 (230) in Bridgetown. Possibly Stephen's best innings, technically and as a captain, came against South Africa in the 2003 World cup where, after Gibbs had bashed the bowlers around, he made 134* in a rain affected match to win an unlikely victory.

One of the main criticisms of his game and particularly his batting record was the failure to convert 50s into 100s. Before 2000 he scored only 2 centuries and even after his retirement it remains a mystery as to this blight on his career. Martin Crowe suggested during his final series in 2008 that the role of captaincy robbed Fleming of important development of batting temperament in his mid-twenties. Indeed his technique had faults, a tendency to get out LBW when out of form was an obvious one (particularly exposed in 2005 against Australia)

While in England Fleming re-looked at his technique and as a result his run scoring increased after 2000. In 2003 he reached the peak of his powers with 274*(476) and 69*(234) in Colombo, once again proving his ability in the sub-continent. This effort, against Murali and all, should also be noted for his declaration on a flat wicket where he was certain to be the first New Zealand player to get 300; the chance for victory was more important. Returning to New Zealand, he made 192 (332) against Pakistan before being named New Zealand's player of the year after ODI hundreds against Pakistan and South Africa (both series were won against opposition renowned for thrashing the Black Caps)

Sadly after 2003 the team's results began to fall away as injury to players like Cairns and Bond weakened the side's ability to get 20 wickets. Some also attribute this trend to the appointment of John Bracewell as coach, a hard man brought in as a friend of Martin Snedden as much as for his skill. The ODI side continued to improve but the fortunes of the test side were summed up by a 3-0 beating in England just 5 years after victory there in 1999. Fleming continued to score runs though with 117 at Nottingham (his home away from home)

In Chittagong during October 2004 he secured 3 New Zealand records during a brilliant innings of 202 (318):
  • Most capped player (87)
  • Most innings played (150)
  • Highest run scorer (passing Crowe)

The rest of the summer was not so pleasing for him or the team as Australia beat them easily 4-0 across 5 matches. In between Fleming scored my personal favourite innings of his, 106 (57) against a FICA XI in a charity match. The ease with which he stuck (not slogged) Murali and Warne for six during this game is a sight I will never forget.

In April 2006 he scored his New Zealand record 3rd double-century in South Africa (262 off 423 balls) but the team lost that series 2-0. In 2007 he led the team to his 4th World Cup (3rd as captain) and they performed well until a tough loss to Sri Lanka in the semi-final. He announced his retirement from the ODI captaincy after this match (and eventually from ODIs altogether. The feeling at the time, and this was expressed during the SKY interview with Ian Smith, was the ODI team needed to prepare for 2011 without him and he wanted to lift the TEST team before he retired. For unknown reasons he lost the captaincy in both forms and I don't blame him for a second for feeling angry at this betrayal (delivered over the phone no less)


Thus Fleming announced that the home series against England in 2008 would be his last. Under the new captain Daniel Vettori he found good form despite a disappointing 2-1 result, scoring 59 and 66 in the final match keeping his average above 40.



In terms of legacy, I believe Stephen Fleming was comparable to Richard Hadlee's influence during the 1980s. His captaincy and occasionally his run scoring returned the side to respectability between 1999 and 2004. He was the ultimate team man and served his country for 11 years as captain of a weaker team than Hadlee's era. As a batsman we will remember our elegant left-hander in the mold of David Gower, wonderful to watch if occasionally frustrating. New Zealanders should take pride in the fact that we witnessed one of the best captains of our history if not the entire history of the game. Current captain Vettori could do a lot worse than follow his example



Stephen Paul Fleming (1994 - 2008)

  • 111 matches 189 innings (10 not outs)
  • 7172 runs @ 40.06 with 9 hundreds and 46 fifties
  • High Score: 274*
  • 171 catches

Records:

  • Most matches, innings, runs and catches by a New Zealand player
  • Most successful New Zealand captain
  • Second most test matches as captain (80)
  • Most ODIs captain (218)

Please comment as to your memories of his career as my memory of him begins in just 2003/4 - basically at the end of his best years


Well that's it from here and I hope you join me again
It's good bye for now

Monday, December 14, 2009

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(END OF DAY FIVE)
PAK 223
NZ 471
PAK 455
NZ 90-0

The rain ruined what should have been victory for NZ

Watling played very well though and finished 60* after some very audacious shots

OBSERVATIONS
  • Vettori received Man of the Match. I always believe that the award should go to the player who influenced the result most (except on occasions of amazing individual achievement). Thus the Groundsman and perhaps the Weatherman are deserving here, both collaborated to inflict a draw on the viewers

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(TEA DAY FIVE)
NZ 46-0 chasing 208

PAK were bowled out eventually for 455 with Southee, O'Brien and Vettori each getting 2 wickets. The surprise effort was Guptill who finished with 3 for 37

McCullum took a NZ record 9 dismissals in the match

The match is set up beautifully for a final session show down

OBSERTVATIONS
  • The question was whether NZ could bowl PAK out and have time to chase a target. They appear to have done that but the next point of interest was who to open with? They opted for the same batsmen and so far they have kept the required runrate at a reasonable level
  • Kaneria will be the bowler to watch in the final overs
  • PAK need quick wickets - the aggressive Guptil, Taylor and McCullum in particular - if they want to save the game (or win it)
  • They offered 1500 to 1 on the tie yesterday - may cost the TAB some money yet
  • A sensational way to finish a good, tight series I plan to sit back and enjoy it. I just hope that NZ lose by attempting a win rather than lose in trying to draw the game (unless 7 wickets of fallen with 100 runs still to get of course)

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(LUNCH DAY FIVE)
PAK 421-7 (lead of 173)

A wicket in the last over before lunch will give hope to those of us yearning for a result this afternoon

Vettori picked up two easy wickets during the session (from bad strokes) but IS bowling very well

OBSERVATIONS
  • The lead is approaching 200 and if it crosses that mark then victory will be tough. The worst case will be if NZ have to chase in an ODI style, at 4-5 runs per over - possible but anymore than that would be too ambitious
  • Vettori MUST attack straight after LUNCH with 2+ slips and O'Brien and himself to bowl. A chance was missed early as the slips-cordon was empty and Vettori's use of a deep point speaks of defensive mindset; as Martin Crowe said during commentary 'you must risk defeat to win test matches'

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(STUMPS DAY FOUR)
PAK 347-4 (lead of 99)

A rain-affected day proceeded slowly (at one point Vettori had figures of 24 overs for just 25 runs!) and PAK passed the deficit and built a small lead

This was led by their captain Yousuf who grafted out a good 89 (212). He was eventually dismissed by a very good ball from O'Brien

With just one day to go the draw seems the obvious result. However if Umar Akmal can survive the early overs tomorrow he has the skill and power to gain a 200+ lead and allow Kaneria to bowl at NZ in the last sessions.
On the other hand if NZ can run through PAK in the morning session they will have time to win the match

OBSERVATIONS
  • It surprised me just as much as everyone else when Guptill took 2 wickets in the morning session but to be honest by late afternoon he was proving dangerous with some really good drift and turn. If he can eradicate the odd full toss he could be a useful part-timer in future (my apologies to Jeetan Patel)
  • The NELSON struck again today as Yousuf was dismissed with the score at 333-3
  • O'Brien looked really good late in the day, he injected some life into proceedings with a hostile spell at Akmal that was better drama than (in Ian Smith's words) Shortland Street
  • A worrying sign for NZ long-term is the lack of form for Chris Martin who has struggled during this series

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(LUNCH DAY FOUR)
PAK 192-2

Vettori ignored the convention of beginning a day's play with pace and instead got Guptill to bowl. The result was two quick wickets from the young man's off-spin (both c&b)

The other bowlers kept things really tight until the break

OBSERVATIONS
  • The PAK openers should feel very embarrassed about getting out to Guptill although the early use of spin may have been unexpected
  • Southee and Martin were getting some good swing, outswing and inswing respectively, due to the cloud cover. If they can pitch the ball up for 4-5 balls an over they should get wickets
  • There is rain Napier this afternoon so expect some time to be lost

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(STUMPS DAY THREE)
PAK 223
NZ 471
PAK 128-0

After Tuffey's entertaining innigs (80*) and Chris Martin's 27th duck, the PAK openers batted out 56 overs on what is now a very dead pitch

OBSERVATIONS
  • This is why we need greener pitches! The last two sessions were extremely dull and the commentators were struggling to conjure topics to keep themselves awake. This kind of pitch will kill test cricket and belongs in the subcontinent
  • NZ still lead by 120 but the prospect of having to take 10 wickets tomorrow will sap the energy from the bowlers (and the viewers)
  • Kaneria will be deadly in the 4th innings - even on this wicket - so NZ don't want to have to chase more than 200

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(LUNCH DAY THREE)
NZ 466-8 (Vettori 134)

If PAK wanted to compete in this game they needed to knock over NZ quickly this morning. NZ needed to crush their opponent's spirits.

Vettori proceeded on his merry way, infuriating the opposition with his movements around the crease and that late cut of his. He was finally dismissed by a very fine catch from Umar Akmal diving to his left

Then came the real salt in the wound for PAK as hope was provided by the quick dismissal of Southee (0) before Tuffey smacked it out of their hands with 76*

OBSERVATIONS
  • For an NZ supporter it is always fun to see the bowlers getting runs and with a substantial score from Tuffey, some commentators may be tempted to take a shot at the batsmen - surely if High Tower can get runs they can!
  • I would stamp on such delusion right now. The pitch is flatter, the bowlers are exhausted, the ball is also 30+ overs old. His half century should be enjoyed but only a fool would use it to bash the top-order
  • The lead is over 200 now and Vettori should crush PAK into the ground. For years they have been beating us comprehensively and now it could be our turn, if NZ can bat another session we should
  • As for the illness hampering Aamer, for him it is a shame but on principle I don't care too much. Every team that tours Pakistan seems to lose their players to stomach bugs so there is some poetic justice here

Friday, December 11, 2009

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(STUMPS DAY TWO)
PAK 223
NZ 346-6 (Vettori 100*, McCullum 89)

NZ's top players went on the counter attack after TEA and as the PAK bowlers became more exhausted the runs flowed: 180 in just 35 overs with just 1 wicket lost

McCullum and Vettori batted beautifully, showing how good this pitch really is, and McCullum was only undone by a really sharp delivery from Gul

OBSERVATIONS
  • The last session really destroyed the PAK bowlers, Kaneria and Aamer both have injuries/niggles and if Vettori can manipulate the total past 400 tomorrow then victory could be on the cards
  • Vettori now has 5 test centuries, his average is 30, plus he and McCullum set a new record 6th wicket partnership against PAK
  • What an amazing turn around, before the TEA break NZ were in huge trouble and were in danger of conceeding a lead but the two most senior players came together in one of the best partnerhips you are likely to see

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(TEA DAY TWO)
166-5


After a terrible batting performance yesterday the PAK bowlers have bowled very well to keep the run-rate down and let the leg-spinner do the wicket taking

The bowlers have been accurate and patient - qualities not on show from the batsmen who have got out to poor strokes

Kaneria has bowled as brilliantly on a flat wicket and has 4/5 wickets

OBSERVATIONS
  • In two sessions, NZ made just 119 runs for the loss of 5 wickets - the lack of the former resulting in the high number of the latter
  • Vettori and McCullum are at the crease and represent the last decent partnership
  • McIntosh did find some form (74 off 187 balls) after changing his guard from middle to leg
  • Again I remind readers that the pitch is very good for batting, it is a mixture of very good bowling and some poor shot selection that is preventing big scores

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(STUMPS DAY ONE)
PAK 223 all out (Farhat 117*)
NZ 47-0

Tuffey accounted for the tail (eventually) and ended with 4 wickets, McCullum took five catches as well

The NZ openers were troubled through out and McIntosh was given out at 1-0 but on review the ball was going over the stumps

OBSERVATIONS
  • a great day for NZ, bouncing back after defeat in Wellington, they look up for a really fight epitomised by O'Brien's aggressive spell before lunch. The batsmen must do their part now and fight like the openers did before stumps
  • However the technical problems may still remain. McIntosh has a horrible technique and it really is just his mental fortitude that prevents him from getting out cheaply
  • NZ must aim to bat for all of tomorrow! This way they should have about 300, their bowlers will have got a rest and can bowl PAK out later, and the mental advantage will be with NZ

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(TEA DAY ONE)
180-7

Imran Farhat's unbeaten hundred lifted PAK to the plain of respectability during this session

The NZ bowlers struck just after LUNCH and just before TEA but the rest was absorbed by a very peculiar innings. Farhat's runs were as scratchy as you're ever likely to see but he is still there and represents PAK best hope after the break

OBSERVATIONS
  • NZ struggled to bowl out the tail yet again (a problem I highlighted in the last test) and the commentators mentioned the absence of Bond. They suggested that you need a bowler like him, McGrath, Steyn or Cairns to trouble the tail-enders. For me the best was always Warne, his spin and variations were too much for most batsmen and the bowlers were more hopeless
  • NZ must take the last 3 wickets quickly and get an hour to bat tonight - a short 10 minute period could be disastrous with such inexperience at the top. Either bowl them out in the first hour or leave it tomorrow - sounds strange but may just be required

Pakistan vs New Zealand 3rd TEST

Running Commentary
(LUNCH DAY ONE)
83-5

A surge of boundaries made the pitch look good and the chance of NZ victory look slim after PAK won the toss and batted

The woeful Shoaib Malik, Peter Fulton and Grant Elliot were missing from the line-ups

Tim Southee returned (21st birthday today) and got an in-swinger through Salman Butt early

Ian O'Brien, retiring after this game, proceeded to extract the little assistence there was in the pitch and edged out 4 wickets for just 3 runs in an amazing spell of aggressive, accurate bowling. He was good enough to get captain Yousuf, Imran Akmal and Misbah-ul-Haq for ducks

the rest of the session included a panicked batting display

OBSERVATIONS
  • The pitch is VERY GOOD, there is some bounce yes but it is pretty flat and looks a beauty to bat on
  • The tumble of wickets was due to pressure and VERY POOR shot selection
  • The chaos extended to the commentary box as well. Martin Crowe and Simon Doull were very hit-and-miss with their analysis. Crowe tried to explain away Yousuf's dismissal (poor cut shot) as due to age - PLEASE if anything that should have been why he wouldn't play such a bad stroke
  • The problem seemed to be of the mind for PAK, with the reputation of Napier as a batting paradise they tried to hit far too many boundaries and paid the price

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Disappointment

Hello and welcome back to my blog

Today I want to take issue with the reporting of the PAK vs NZ result from Sunday. The NZ Herald featured an article that included factual and analytical errors as well as blatant plagarism of the TV commentary during the game

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10613812&pnum=2

Those of us with any knowledged of the game's history will know that the largest 4th innings chase was completed by West Indies against Australia when 418 was achieved (May 2003) not 405 as stated in the second paragraph. There is also the suggestion that this was a 'lopsided contest' which ignores the fact that apart from the freak score of 99, this test was very even, there was no large turn around in fortune for Pakistan, just one terrible 37-over period on DAY TWO for New Zealand

The statistics about Ross Taylor scoring more runs than the other 5 top-order batsmen was taken from the TV commentary during Sunday's play, as was the section about Kaneria's bowling stats; it would be nice if the article gave credit for this analysis to anyone but itself

The only point that was insightful was the comparison of this series to the 2-1 loss to England in 2008 when New Zealand lost in Wellington and Napier after leading 1-0. However England were the dominant team in that series where as Pakistan are still fragile in their batting and woeful in their fielding - the article said very little about the catches that went down in this test - the deciding game is for either team to win if they lift their performance.

Naturally after reading this second-rate article I looked to other sources for better analysis but Stuff.co.nz provided the EXACT same article (provided by NZPA I'm told)
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/3130729/Pakistan-downs-Black-Caps
A disappointing Sunday all round really

Well that's it from here and I hope you join me again
It's good bye for now

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Pakistan vs New Zealand 2nd TEST

CONCLUSION

The weather turned to rain in Wellington, but not before Pakistan bowled out New Zealand for 263 and won this test to go level (the decider will begin in Napier on Friday 11th of December). Chasing 405 to win was never really on the cards, on a wicket where no one could get 100 and no team could get 275+. New Zealand effectively lost this game on DAY TWO when they were shot out for just 99. The media will focus on that disaster but I think allowing Pakistan to get from 161-6 to 264 was a problem too - the last 4 of their batsmen/tailenders scored more runs than all of New Zealand's 10!

If the first test will be remembered as a tight contest between two, talented if not polished, even teams then this one will go down as a race to the bottom in terms of skill. New Zealand's batting and Pakistan's fielding - the latter could have dismissed the opposition 3 times if catches were held. The first test was a perfect model for the game while the second was a nightmare - neither team can possibly be satisfied with how they performed (NZ in particular).
The captaincy of Yousuf was terrible as well - giving singles to a number 10 to get at the number 11! On the other hand Vettori's choice to bowl Elliot proved to be spot on and could have won the test if they had scored even 200 in the first innings

Unfortunately the third test will be played in Napier - a bowler's graveyard to match the most dry wicket in India or Pakistan - and a result may be hard to come by. Pakistan need to work on their fielding for about a week I would say while New Zealand have selection issues once again. Here are some ideas/points:

  • Patel may be needed as a second spin option instead of Tuffey whose skills are better suited to greener wickets
  • Elliot and Fulton NEED to go, neither are in any kind of form nor appear to have the right technique or will power for Test Cricket
  • With two hundreds in his last two games, Neil Broom should debut at 5 and Vettori MUST rise to 6 - if just for this deciding game
  • Tim Southee debuted with success at this ground and the temptation will be to bring him back at 8
  • Flynn and Guptill should trade places

The emphasis should be on getting 20 wickets to win - the pitch should allow the batsmen to get runs (although 99 would leaves me with some doubt)

Well that's it from here and I hope you join me again
It's good bye for now

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Pakistan vs New Zealand 2nd TEST

Running Commentary
(END OF DAY ONE)

Bad light ended play early with PAK really in trouble at 161-6

Tuffey grabbed two wickets after TEA in his come back match with persistent, accurate bowling

Vettori took his third wicket to remove the last recognised batsman

OBSERVATIONS
  • The batting of PAK looked more and more desparate as wickets fell and should feel lucky that bad light stopped play or they could well have suffered more damage
  • Hopefully the weather will improve over the next 4 days so NZ can press the advantage but there is still the matter of how their batsmen will play

Pakistan vs New Zealand 2nd TEST

Running Commentary
(TEA DAY ONE)

Appropriately the 50th test at the Basin Reserve was delayed by rain so that the entire first session was not played. Equally appropriate were the conditions when play started - windy and cold

The ball moved around but the bowlers did not have the control of line and length required to exploit it - Chris Martin in particular struggled

The openers got through the first spells and began to look very secure until O'Brien got the breakthrough 60-1

This became 66-3 as Vettori struck twice and importantly dismissed Yousuf for a duck with an arm ball that trapped the PAK captain on the crease

OBSERVATIONS
  • Umar Akmal, after scoring a debut century last week, was shifted to no. 3 in the batting in a odd decision given the conditions, but he is still there at TEA and his wicket will be required quickly if NZ wish take the advantage
  • Vettori is bowling very well, his variation of pace and flight was very good but the field placements for his own bowling are very defensive
  • Simon Doull in commentary noted that bowlers must be prepared 'to be driven at the Basin' and I didn't see enough of this till the last 20 minutes